We spend a lot of our time advocating for Open Access, and more specifically, helping staff make their research Open Access by uploading it to SURE.  I thought it might be useful to think about what we expect from SURE, what it’s for, and what Institutional Repositories in general can offer to the academic community.
SURE, like all institutional repositories, is an online archive that collects, preserves, and provides the means for the dissemination of research outputs produced by researchers at the University of Sunderland.  From a purely practical point of view, SURE provides an accurate record of the intellectual output of the University.  Anything you add to SURE will also appear on your staff profile page, so it’s an easy way to keep your list of publications up-to-date as well.
Beyond this though, the contents of SURE can be made available to anyone with access to the web, allowing you to meet the Open Access requirements of funders, the university, and the next Research Excellence Framework exercise (REF) without any additional cost.  This method of achieving Open Access is referred to as the Green Route (as opposed to the Gold Route that refers to Open Access publishing), and there’ll be more on this later.


Although many researchers archive their work on personal web pages or blogs, repositories can better facilitate open access to this material by providing persistent URLs, they generally have more robust technical support, and, as Peter Suber has noted, ‘[…] don’t disappear when the author changes jobs or dies’. (p 64).  The contents of repositories are also more discoverable due to the interoperability of initiatives like the OAI which allows metadata to be harvested more effectively;  and services like CORE offer a global aggregation of repository contents, meaning that research in SURE is a lot more visible to prospective readers and future collaborators.
For many researchers, Open Access means paying to publish.  Journals charge authors, or rather their funders, or even their home institutions, an Article Processing Charge (APC) upon acceptance, and then the resulting paper is made available to readers for free.  This so-called ‘Gold’ route to OA was a (very successful, from the point of view of the larger academic publishers) response by publishers to the calls for increased accessibility to published research findings from governments, funding bodies, and the general public, who, under the traditional subscription method, were unable to access a great deal of publicly-funded research simply because they weren’t affiliated with an academic institution.   Although the model allows free access to articles, the costs can be considerable and wildly inconsistent, ranging from zero to $12,290 per article for the journal Nature.
SURE represents a different, ‘Green’, model of Open Access to research, one with no additional costs beyond the maintenance of the platform.  Authors can publish with any journal and then upload the final author-created accepted manuscript (AAM) to the repository.  This version of the article is essentially the same as the one that appears in publication, but doesn’t contain any of the typesetting or branding added by the publisher.  SURE always provides a hyperlink to the published version, and also cites that version in the metadata.  Most journals now allow the AAM of a published article to be uploaded to SURE, but many of them impose an embargo, which can lead to problems when funders require that AAMs be deposited immediately upon publication.

In the next part of this series, I’ll look at the specifics of how SURE can meet the OA requirements, and what tools are available to help you decide where to publish and still be OA-compliant.