The theme of Open Access week this year is “Community over commercialization”.  

Across the next seven days, the Research and Scholarly Communications Team in the University Library Services will share with you some initiatives that aim to transform scholarly publishing and move away from the for-profit publishing that has largely dominated academic publishing.

Theme 7. Open Access and research assessment

The move toward Open Access of scholarly communications is clearly driven by funders mandates and research assessments practices. Since the 2012 Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA), there has been a recognition that research assessments need to be reformed to provide a true assessment of what makes good research. The aim of these reforms is to recognise the varied research outputs that emerge from research and eschew the use problematic metrics (such as Journal Impact factor) used as proxy for measuring quality.

 

 In the context of the UK, the first decisions of the forthcoming REF 2028 insists on the importance of developing a positive research culture. In particular, there is a stated aim to reconsider what should be recognised and rewarded as part of the research assessment and to consider how research culture is supported. In many ways, opening access to research is an important element of creating a positive research culture at institutional, national and international level. Sharing research results as openly as possible is one of the building blocks to move away from the competitive culture instilled by the use of questionable metrics to assess research. It creates an environment in which sharing is important and recognised as more valuable than restricting access.  

It is also important to note that DORA, of which the University of Sunderland is a signatory, recognises the need to assess research on its own merits, not based on where it is published. This can hopefully enable researchers to be more confident to choose reputable Open Access venues to publish over the traditional, locked behind paywall, high impact factor journal that might not contribute to creating a positive research culture.