The theme of Open Access week this year is “Community over commercialization”.

Across the next seven days, the Research and Scholarly Communications Team in the University Library Services will share with you some initiatives that aim to transform scholarly publishing and move away from the for-profit publishing that has largely dominated academic publishing.

  1. Preprints and Open Review.

A preprint article is the version of your work before it has been submitted to a journal or been peer-reviewed. Using a pre-print server is an opportunity to share research at an early stage. In some disciplines, the use of preprint repositories or servers has been embedded for some time and is integral to the communication of research and results. Results of research projects are disseminated more quickly and feedback from the research community can help refine your work.  One of the first preprints repository, started in 1991, was ArXiv with a focus on physics.

Over the years, further preprint servers were created with different disciplinary focus. The Directory of Open Access Preprint Repositories is a useful tool to identify these.

As we move towards more open access, preprints repositories can be used to transform traditional academic publishing. Indeed, these servers could become central in the publishing process without the intervention of traditional journal structures. By embracing the notion of open peer-review,  some projects see preprint repositories as an alternative route to publication which embraces the ideals of open research. 

Open peer-review eschews the traditional double-blind peer-review process. The reviewers are identified, and the reviews are public. This aims to encourage both more rigor in the review process and to discourage the dreaded reviewer two comments that can be disparaging as they are discouraging, especially to early career researchers.

There are a range of different models emerging, all of them non-profit with a desire create a more equitable and fairer system of scholarly communications. These initiatives aim to speed-up the research process :

Image of a preprint articleReview Commons: a preprint platform that offers a review service. It is affiliated with a number of journals to which these refereed preprints can be submitted. Their aim is a speedier process of publication.

Peer Community in (PCI) PCI evaluates articles submitted to its platform and helps the author to make them citable, Once recommended for publication they can be published for free in Peer Community Journal or be submitted to a PCI friendly journal.

Rapid Reviews – (Focus on infectious disease) An initiative that emerged from MIT during the Covid-19 pandemic, Rapid reviews seeks to accelerate the peer-review process. Its team looks through preprint servers, identifying work on infectious diseases and reviews them. These reviews are then published and linked to the preprint.

PreReview – With a focus on providing a voice to ‘systematically disadvantaged scientists’. It provides training on peer-review practices and challenges the "behind closed door" model of traditional peer-review. It aims to make the evaluation of research more equitable and provide reviews of preprints already on preprint servers.

Science CoLab – Inspired by what they call a ‘Publish, Review, Curate’ model which disrupts current practices, Science CoLab emphasises the community work behind publications. Authors decide when to publish their work, it is then assessed through open peer-reviews, improved and once the author deems the work finished, it can be placed in a curated collection.

These models all give the academic community more control over the publication process and aim to make research more open.